This really is designed to be the "check out" powder-or darn near it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It really is the foundation for numerous pet loads, yet I have never been satisfied with the effects.
They may be a similar factor, but H4831 sc is Slice shorter so it will pack right into a case less difficult then the traditional, and occasionally like our 7mm rem mag it enables us to incorporate additional powder then just the conventional H4831.
The obvious lead to can be a rough/ruff bore. No amount of copper fouling lessening brokers during the powder will probably appropriate this.
Which means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, look for a beginning load when only one is shown for a specific cartridge.
Anyway, I realized The 2 pounds of H4831SC made use of the identical data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was anything at all unique between a pound of powder labeled "Severe" and just one not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon confirmed that they have been in reality identical and the only big difference was The emblem to the label.
Did you at any time attempt H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with normal chamber. Thinking what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the sole true variation would be that the shortcut meters greater by reloading machines. At the time it's loaded theres no functional distinction. I have listened to that the shortcut might have a tiny little bit a lot quicker melt away amount but it seems insignificant.
Im beneath the knowledge I choose to use h4831sc. I have read through that these powders are h4831 vs h4831sc identical In addition to the shorter grain sizing with the sc. Ought to I still be on the lookout for h4381sc?
It's possible you'll possibly: one) Continue and have the firearm(s) h4831sc detailed under mechanically removed from your shopping cart:
The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they have slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are far better. It bug the hell out of me. I am aware greater. That's why I do not ever toss out my older manuals. I do invest in new guide continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ degrees with none difficulties.
This is an older thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving an previous thread. Remember to think about creating a new thread.
Like Everybody explained, the SC means “brief Slice” and is a little bit simpler to meter. Will make you issue why they'd continue to make the normal just one.
rayporter mentioned: i in no way observed a difference besides the standard is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Simply click to increase...
This seems like a good place to disclose somewhat more data on Hodgdon, H4831 exclusively...I after had a pound of H4831SC sit around the shelf for a number of h4831sc load data decades. It absolutely was acquired just before Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Severe" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a component.